In message <
[email protected]>, Gene E. Bloch
[1] Brookstone says "And it works on virtually any website that accepts
credit card payments". To me, that seems to mean "any site that has
been willing to install the client software". They also say "Just plug
I was going to say hat to me, that sounds as if it just saves you typing
the details on the card (and seventy bucks seems a lot to pay to just
save some typing!); to sort this out once and for all, we need an answer
to Irwell's question of what exactly is on the stripe on a card (in
particular, is there anything that _isn't_ also on the card in
human-readable form).
But I've now looked at it (the Brookstone one not the square; the square
looks a clever piece of business and technology, and I actually admire
what they've done, both technically and business wise: it seems to be a
way for any small business to start accepting cards, with minimal
[zero!] outlay and for a percentage. But I digress ...), and the web
page (for the Brookstone one) says "swipe your card right at your PC and
it's instantly on the site, encrypted" and "Never again expose your
credit card number over the Internet." Both of those _do_ suggest it
does _extra_ encryption, which obviously _would_ need matching software
to have been installed at the receiving end, which means saying "it
works on virtually any website that accepts credit card payments" is
just plain dishonest. In fact, one or other of those sets of statements
_has_ to be dishonest - or, at least, require considerable further
clarification.
I suppose there's the remote possibility that it's just saying use of
the https system provides some encryption - but then _implying_ that the
_device_ adds it is disingenuous at least. (I presume we all know at the
very least never to enter credit card details into a non-https: page!)
the USB cable into any available USB port" at various sorts of places.
This doesn't sound like it runs on software installed on the user's
computer.
If you think that is speculation on my part, you're right, of course.
But I will clainm that it is intelligent speculation
Likewise! They need to explain more. (If not doing so is part of the
security involved, security-by-obscurity is widely disparaged.)
Even without it adding any security, I can see one group of people for
whom it _could_ be useful - the blind; however, the ones I know would
balk at the price, and I would hope plain (non-encrypting) swipe readers
are available for less (I haven't looked).