OT.... but I need help

K

Ken Blake

Mine is off by 5-6 minutes per month,

Wow, that's a lot! I wear a Citizen watch, analog, but battery
operated. It's about 3-4 years old, and is near perfect. Whatever it's
error amount is, I don't notice it and never adjust it except when
traveling from one time zone to another.
 
K

Ken Blake

On 11/4/2012 10:36 AM, Ken Blake wrote:
Soda is also sold in liter sizes tho' there are a bewildering variety of
soda cans: 300ml, 330ml, 12 fl. oz etc.

Yes, thanks. I had forgotten about soda bottles (I very seldom drink
any soda). But I think my experience with cans is exclusively 12 oz
(also called 355 ml).
 
J

John Williamson

Ken said:
Wow, that's a lot! I wear a Citizen watch, analog, but battery
operated. It's about 3-4 years old, and is near perfect. Whatever it's
error amount is, I don't notice it and never adjust it except when
traveling from one time zone to another.
For what it's worth, all my Casio watches of various ages consistently
gain about a second a day, and have done from new.
 
F

Fokke Nauta

Me too, although it was never even started sensibly. Changing a speed
limit from 55 mph to 88 kph made no sense, as far as I'm concerned; it
should have been changed to 60 kph.

And selling things like milk in .9463 liter bottles instead of 1 liter
bottles made no sense either.

These kinds of things (and there were many others) weren't really
changing to the metric system.

We should change to the metric system primarily because our
measurement system should be the same as the rest of the world's, and
secondarily because the metric system is much easier to do arithmetic
in.

As far as I know, the only thing that we use the metric system for is
wine and liquor bottles.

And we should also change to using Celsius for temperatures, because
the rest of the world does. Most people seem to think that's part of
the metric system, but I don't.
The US use still Fahrenheit, don't they?
Though it's got nothing to do with the metric system.
Fokke
 
F

Fokke Nauta

No, valves.
I started on ICL machines with ferrite-core rings as memory bits; second
generation mainframes.

Ed
Oh God, the old memory cards with ferrite rings. How amazing and
wonderful they were ...

4K or something?

Fokke
 
J

J. P. Gilliver (John)

[QUOTE="Paul said:
So how far from perfect is it likely to be after ten years?
Mine is off by 5-6 minutes per month, which makes it[/QUOTE]
[]
You haven't stopped wearing it and started carrying it in a pocket, by
any chance? That'd be likely to make a difference to its accuracy.
 
J

J. P. Gilliver (John)

Ken Blake said:
Me too, although it was never even started sensibly. Changing a speed
limit from 55 mph to 88 kph made no sense, as far as I'm concerned; it
should have been changed to 60 kph.
That would have been awfully slow (-:
And selling things like milk in .9463 liter bottles instead of 1 liter
bottles made no sense either.
We seem to manage OK with milk: a UK pint is somewhat more than half a
litre, so our milk is sold in one point something litre bottles (2
pints), and has been for some time. And jam (US: jelly) in 454g jars,
and ...
These kinds of things (and there were many others) weren't really
changing to the metric system.
Manufacturers here _are_ gradually switching to rounder numbers, but it
does seem to be taking many decades. I guess the main reason is that
they have machinery in the old Imperial sizes, that refuses to wear out;
partly being wary of being accused of trying to take advantage (some
folk have long memories from when we metricated the currency, about
1970!), and partly "to give customers what they want".
We should change to the metric system primarily because our
measurement system should be the same as the rest of the world's, and
secondarily because the metric system is much easier to do arithmetic
in.
Very true.
As far as I know, the only thing that we use the metric system for is
wine and liquor bottles.
And for those (wine, at least - can't say for liquor), the strange unit
the centilitre (cl) is used, which isn't used anywhere else in the
metric system! (At least, in UK it is.)
And we should also change to using Celsius for temperatures, because
the rest of the world does. Most people seem to think that's part of
the metric system, but I don't.
Well, it is a "centigrade" system - 100 degrees between freezing and
boiling, or at least that was the intention, and is still close enough
to that for practical purposes.
 
A

ASCII

Ken said:
So how far from perfect is it likely to be after ten years?
If the battery still takes a charge, it will be dead on,
or only a fraction of a second off at most.
http://tinyurl.com/abqdpf9
Last night when we (California) went from Arizona (DST) time back
to our Pacific Standard Time it set itself automatically.
 
E

Ed Cryer

Fokke said:
J. P. Gilliver (John) said:
In message <[email protected]>, Ed Cryer
[]
We called them "thermionic valves" if anybody ever asked us what a
"valve" was.
When I started as a computer programmer one of the women in the office
told us how she programmed first-generation machines; and she used to
"hide from her boss in the memory cupboard".
I should think it was quite hot in there.

Ed

Depends; if it was core storage, maybe not ...
No, valves.
I started on ICL machines with ferrite-core rings as memory bits; second
generation mainframes.

Ed
Oh God, the old memory cards with ferrite rings. How amazing and
wonderful they were ...

4K or something?

Fokke
The largest I worked on was a 1906A; a massive 250KB memory, for which
we had to modularise all programming, even though it ended up being
front-ended by a 1904S.

Ed
 
P

Paul

J. P. Gilliver (John) said:
Mine is off by 5-6 minutes per month, which makes it
[]
You haven't stopped wearing it and started carrying it in a pocket, by
any chance? That'd be likely to make a difference to its accuracy.
It's had a rough life. It stays on my wrist, except
for incidents where it flies off my wrist and hits
a wall :) (Racquet sports...) The watch is on its third
strap.

For some reason, the face of the watch is a bit scratched up.

Paul
 
C

charlie

The US use still Fahrenheit, don't they?
Though it's got nothing to do with the metric system.
Fokke
As I remember it, one of the objections to changing to
Centigrade/Celsius had to do with the "size" of a degree.

When I was in high school, physics was a real pain, simply because you
had to lean how to deal with/work equations that were based upon mixed
metric and English measurements, constants, etc. And then you added
slide rule accuracy and interpolation.
 
C

charlie

Fokke said:
J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
In message <[email protected]>, Ed Cryer
[]
We called them "thermionic valves" if anybody ever asked us what a
"valve" was.
When I started as a computer programmer one of the women in the office
told us how she programmed first-generation machines; and she used to
"hide from her boss in the memory cupboard".
I should think it was quite hot in there.

Ed

Depends; if it was core storage, maybe not ...

No, valves.
I started on ICL machines with ferrite-core rings as memory bits; second
generation mainframes.

Ed
Oh God, the old memory cards with ferrite rings. How amazing and
wonderful they were ...

4K or something?

Fokke
The largest I worked on was a 1906A; a massive 250KB memory, for which
we had to modularise all programming, even though it ended up being
front-ended by a 1904S.

Ed
One of the last gasps of core memory I remember was "plated wire memory"
in the 1970s. I worked for GE back then, and we used rejected Mil Spec
memory planes (After thorough testing) for memory in some of our machine
control systems. They were interesting in that one computer could run
multiple numeric control machines, using Daisey chained I/O modules.

If you had a two computer system, and one failed, the other could
automatically sub for the failed one, and even be used to diagnose the
failure.

The memory was purchased from one of GE's military divisions.
When we went into actual production line operation, GE had purchased
what were then advanced memory test systems.

After the test systems were delivered, setup, and accepted, the
OEM's installation crew was told that they were laid off, and the
systems were the last off the production line. I have no idea how they
got back to California.
 
G

Gene E. Bloch

What do you need a trimmer for IF it has been set properly at the
factory. --
choro
*****
Your question implies its answer.

Obviously.
 
C

choro

J. P. Gilliver (John) said:
Ken Blake wrote:
Even if a watch is "perfect" when it leaves the factory, it won't
be perfect any more in ten years time.
So how far from perfect is it likely to be after ten years?


Mine is off by 5-6 minutes per month, which makes it
[]
You haven't stopped wearing it and started carrying it in a pocket, by
any chance? That'd be likely to make a difference to its accuracy.
It's had a rough life. It stays on my wrist, except
for incidents where it flies off my wrist and hits
a wall :) (Racquet sports...) The watch is on its third
strap.

For some reason, the face of the watch is a bit scratched up.
I wonder why?! ;-)
 
C

choro

That would have been awfully slow (-:
Look, if you want to get on with metrication, you convert road speeds to
the nearest sensible figure which in this case would have been 90 kph.

Of course the antis used such stupid arguments. There is no reason why
the bottle capacity couldn't be uppped to a sensible 1 lt. In fact a lot
of places sell milk in littre bottles nowadays. Supermarkets in general
still stick to pints (UK pints of course!) but also declare the exact
equivalent in littres as required by law.
We seem to manage OK with milk: a UK pint is somewhat more than half a
litre, so our milk is sold in one point something litre bottles (2
pints), and has been for some time. And jam (US: jelly) in 454g jars,
and ...

Manufacturers here _are_ gradually switching to rounder numbers, but it
does seem to be taking many decades. I guess the main reason is that
they have machinery in the old Imperial sizes, that refuses to wear out;
partly being wary of being accused of trying to take advantage (some
folk have long memories from when we metricated the currency, about
1970!), and partly "to give customers what they want".
It's all a question of fooling the customers and trying to keep prices
attractive. To the customer 500g and 454g quantities look the same but
to the manufacturer/retailer "cheating" by 46g per pack is significant!
I doubt that it is old machinery refusing to wear out! That's a lot of
bullshit after all these years!
Very true.

And for those (wine, at least - can't say for liquor), the strange unit
the centilitre (cl) is used, which isn't used anywhere else in the
metric system! (At least, in UK it is.)
cl = cc

Well, you are WRONG! It IS part of the metric system.
Well, it is a "centigrade" system - 100 degrees between freezing and
boiling, or at least that was the intention, and is still close enough
to that for practical purposes.
The antis will come out with all sorts of silly and stupid arguments but
in the end they will eventually come round.

Different standards in different parts of the world are used as weapons
in the struggle to win and keep markets. And most people fail to realize
this.
 
C

Char Jackson

Me too, although it was never even started sensibly. Changing a speed
limit from 55 mph to 88 kph made no sense, as far as I'm concerned; it
should have been changed to 60 kph.
I sure hope that "60 kph" was a typo! 55 MPH was bad enough, but 35
MPH would have been brutally slow. Texas just opened a road between
San Antonio and Austin with an 85 MPH speed limit. That's something
I'd like to see a lot more of. I already drive that speed more often
than not, but it would be nice if it were legal.
 
C

Char Jackson

[QUOTE="Paul said:
Even if a watch is "perfect" when it leaves the factory, it won't
be perfect any more in ten years time.
So how far from perfect is it likely to be after ten years?
Mine is off by 5-6 minutes per month, which makes it
[]
You haven't stopped wearing it and started carrying it in a pocket, by
any chance? That'd be likely to make a difference to its accuracy.[/QUOTE]

I stopped wearing a watch in 1983, when a motorcycle accident stopped
my Timex dead in its tracks at 3:08 PM. I've found that I don't need a
watch, especially in the past decade or longer, since cell phones can
tell time and there are always lots of other clocks around.

Does anyone under the age of about 60 still wear a watch?
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top