v In
Char said:
AOL? Are they still around? Anyway, look for a logging function in
your email client and see what it tells you. I suspect your problems
have very little to do with the OS, especially since a few million
other people seem to have things working ok.
First, I got a lifetime deal through QuantumLink. Who is QuantumLink you
ask? It is AOL before they were AOL. They were a great company back
then. So I am stuck with AOL now for life. Sure I can can them, but it
is free. ;-)
And be careful of saying things like millions are using AOL email
trouble free. I didn't Google it, but I think that wouldn't be true.
I don't believe you when you attempt to blame your problems on Windows
updates. You've cried wolf way too often. Just troubleshoot the issue
and fix it.
I'd be careful! I remember finding bugs in MS-DOS since '83 or so. I
actually called them up. And you know what they said? They said they
knew about the bug and thousands of software has already written around
the bug and if they fixed it, it would break all of them. So what did I
do? I wrote around the bug too.
There wasn't too much happening as far as updates in the 80's. Sure they
were there, but virtually everything didn't affect me. So things were
pretty quiet as far as I was concern.
Then along comes OS/2. Microsoft and IBM had already broken off, but I
thought this was the next best thing. Now it was all IBM's baby. OS/2
2.1 was running really great. Then I signed up for OS/2 Warp beta (aka
v3). Again everything was going great. After two successful betas, IBM
released OS/2 Warp to the public. Huge disaster! They changed most of
the drivers without beta testing them. Stories range from half of the
beta testers couldn't even install it.
I couldn't either. My CD drive was set at drive 1 when the driver only
accepted drive 0 (you didn't know why back then). I finally got it
installed by creating floppies that bypassed any CD problems. This was
only the start of the problems. Their updates were called FixPaks. And
OS/2 had a lot of Microsoft code in it and they were hell bent on
removing it all and to replace it with their own. As they still had to
pay Microsoft for the code that they used back then. And FixPak after
FixPak, it got worse and worse. After desperation they would plug some
of Microsoft's code back in. And this made it useable again. But it was
still a total mess and after two years of using OS/2 Warp, I called it
quits and switched totally to Windows.
Windows 3.xx, 95 and 98 and updates went fine. Sure there was quirks
here and there, but not big deal. And unlike most, I even could get
Windows ME to run satisfactory. Although I also quickly learned, don't
change anything in ME once you got it working right or it might fall.
Then I moved on to Windows 2000. Out of the box it was just great! Then
updates started to come in and it seemed like every other one would
break Explorer. I don't remember any other problems except Explorer. I
had other machines so if Explorer broke, I still had another one without
that troublesome update. This continued until like forever.
I didn't switch to XP until just before SP2 was released. Everything
seemed fine. Then the SP2 update came along. Lots of buzz about how
terrible the upgrade went. I didn't have any of those problems reported,
but I tried upgrading like 6 different computers and everything worked
and all. But all of the computers slowed down to a snail's pace.
What worked, was to wipe everything clean and to reinstall from scratch.
Then update to SP2 and that worked perfectly on all of the computers. No
problems at all. Although after SP2, things started to change. That old
Explorer crashing thing came back. There are other things, but the
latest is .NET won't update nor uninstall. Lots of info on the Internet
about that. Most solutions don't work too well.
I skipped Vista, so I don't know much about the horrors there. But when
I started running Windows 7, everything was running fine except
compatibility with old software. Then SP1 came along. My Windows Index
Experience dropped and my TV tuner under Media Center became very
choppy. Paul thinks a driver got replaced by Microsoft and I think he is
right.
Now around '07 I bought an EeePC with a 4GB SSD soldered on the
motherboard. No chance of upgrading it. Sure I heard horror stories from
others about upgrades that beat my own hands down. And I really wanted
to keep this machine that came with XP SP2 updated, but there was no
room to do so.
I really believed back then without updates, it would become really
horrifying. I really believed that I would be restoring a lot due to
malware and all. That EeePC ran great for a whole year. And this defies
everything I have heard before. Sure I have heard stories that this is
true, but I didn't believe it.
So I had taken like 6 of my computers that I used for a test. They were
all running fine at the moment and I stopped updating them and waiting
for all hell to break loose. After four years later, everything is still
just fine. No malware infections or anything. Now I have a feeling of
utopia.
Many people in the past claimed that updates can break the OS. Being an
EE and a programmer when I had too, I should have seen it. But I was
stubborn and I refused to believe it. But after decades of this nonsense
I can't deny it anymore. And that is you can't change the OS without
some harmful effects.
Now if you never had a problem. Two things could be happening. One you
are in denial like I was. Or you are one of the lucky ones. ;-)