Good move. There comes a time when it's worth noting that the effort is
being wasted.
This is a lesson that I am sometimes too slow to learn
"This is a lesson that I am sometimes too slow to learn
"
I'll second and third that, and add that you're definitely not alone!
My blood pressure went down considerably when I realized the error of my
ways, although the pocketbook whimpers from time to time!
Scanners have always been of interest to me, since I was also interested
in photography. Fax and scan in general were areas that classically had
some real problems, resulting in a lot of head scratching, nasty words,
and so forth. Twain was an attempt to try and inject some sanity, and
was doing well until MS decided to implement their unique version, and
screwed up the standard ones. Oh Well!
At least USB I/O won the battle. Before that, even the scanner's I/O
interface was up for grabs, with a fax unique i/o (Panasonic and copier
OEM's loved it), SCSI, modified SCSI(simplified SCSI I/O cards that
didn't follow the standards), serial, and parallel i/o(modified Centronics).
One of my more notable experiences with a scanner was a warranty return.
Seems that the scanner used a parallel cable that had identical
connectors on both ends, and looked like a conventional parallel cable,
but was not. Inadvertently reversing the cable resulted in killing the
scanner's interface circuitry. I took back the failed scanner, exchanged
it for a better one, and got a significant refund to boot.
When all was said and done, I had all of $60 invested in a $200 or so
scanner.
I still wish that the scanner mfrs and MS would eliminate the unneeded
wait for the lamp bit that I still see in some of the scanner software.