Ken Blake has written on 7/4/2013 10:57 AM:
It would be helpful for us inefficient retirees if there were a list of
browsers and their features somewhere, with perhaps a comparison chart.
Yes, I agree that it would be helpful. But if you could find such a
thing, I caution you not to rely on it too much. A name for a feature,
or even a description of a feature, doesn't tell you a whole lot
about it, how it works, how you will like it, and so on. To return to
the example I used earlier, saying that Maxthon has mouse gestures
tells you nothing about how it works, how good it is, or how much you
would like it.
The only good way to evaluate a feature is to try it.
And a comparison chart? You mean a chart that would say that a feature
in program X is better than a feature in program Y? I caution you here
too. Don't rely too much on other people's views, whether it's a
magazine writer's views, my views, or anyone else's views. You should
try them for yourself and make your own decision on what works best
for *you*.
And one further point: if you compare the feature set of five
competing programs (whether browsers or anything else) you can
probably find something in each of them that you like better than in
all the competition. Doing X in program A might be better than doing
it in all the others, but doing Y is best in program B, and so on. You
should make your choice based on your personal evaluation of which of
these is most important to you. And that's why I haven't tried to tell
you which browser you should use. It doesn't have to be the one that I
think is best; you should make your own choices.