Folder disappears fromk desktop!

G

Gene E. Bloch

Many many people have had instances of corrupted desktops and any data
stored there is GONE.
Google it.
I don't care WHAT it says in Windows 7 "help" - I repeat - the Desktop
is NOT DESIGNED to store data. If it was, why would there be the need
for "Documents" folder or "Music" folder etc, why not just store it all
on the Desktop?
Now you're just being silly.
 
E

Ed Cryer

Many many people have had instances of corrupted desktops and any data
stored there is GONE.
Google it.
I don't care WHAT it says in Windows 7 "help" - I repeat - the Desktop
is NOT DESIGNED to store data. If it was, why would there be the need
for "Documents" folder or "Music" folder etc, why not just store it all
on the Desktop?
Think, Gordon, think! Get away from misconceptions, and think in digital
terms!

You have a hard drive; and it contains files. One of them is in a User
tree; called Desktop.

Forget about the presentation of this data to human eyes; to human forms
of cognition. Think of the bits and bytes.

Ed
 
Z

Zaphod Beeblebrox

Alias said:
Hmmm, I was misled, then. To be honest, I never tried it. Oh well,
you live and learn.
Indeed.

--
Zaphod

Arthur Dent, speaking to Trillian about Zaphod:
"So, two heads is what does it for a girl?"
"...Anything else he's got two of?"
 
G

Gene E. Bloch

I don't do that, but I'm not averse to using it as a quick temporary
storage area so I don't have to go hunt something down or as a
long-term location to keep very frequently accessed items - whether
shortcuts or actual <gasp> "data" files! I see no reason not to do
so. Especially since if you extend the "Desktop" metaphor you would
not worry about putting a folder of project documents on your actual
desktop for a week or two since you are working on it actively, then
putting it away in your file drawer when done, or keeping a rolodex,
pictures of the family, etc. permanently on your desk. If it fits how
you work, why not?
What, no ash tray? [This is meant as a joke!]

Also, maybe the OP's desktop folder was a folder of *shortcuts*. There's
a radical idea for Gordon to think about.
 
Z

Zaphod Beeblebrox

Gordon said:
Many many people have had instances of corrupted desktops and any
data stored there is GONE.
Google it.
I don't care WHAT it says in Windows 7 "help" - I repeat - the
Desktop is NOT DESIGNED to store data. If it was, why would there be
the need for "Documents" folder or "Music" folder etc, why not just
store it all on the Desktop?
So then, by following your so-called logic the Documents folder is not
designed to hold music files, and the Music folder is not designed to
hold pictures, etc. so being "SPECIAL SYSTEM folders" and all, if we
do store the other types of data in them, we are somehow at risk of
losing the data... ? I mean really, "many people have had instances
of corrupt Documents/Music/Pictures folders and any data there is
GONE. Google it."

Sigh.
 
Z

Zaphod Beeblebrox

Gene E. Bloch said:
I don't do that, but I'm not averse to using it as a quick
temporary
storage area so I don't have to go hunt something down or as a
long-term location to keep very frequently accessed items - whether
shortcuts or actual <gasp> "data" files! I see no reason not to do
so. Especially since if you extend the "Desktop" metaphor you
would
not worry about putting a folder of project documents on your
actual
desktop for a week or two since you are working on it actively,
then
putting it away in your file drawer when done, or keeping a
rolodex,
pictures of the family, etc. permanently on your desk. If it fits
how
you work, why not?
What, no ash tray? [This is meant as a joke!]
On my personal desk at home, 10 years ago there would have been...
Though I can't think of an electronic equivalent right off :)
Also, maybe the OP's desktop folder was a folder of *shortcuts*.
There's
a radical idea for Gordon to think about.
I mentioned that in another sub-thread, but I suspect it will fall on
deaf ears - erm, eyes.
 
P

Paul

Gordon said:
Many many people have had instances of corrupted desktops and any data
stored there is GONE.
Google it.
I don't care WHAT it says in Windows 7 "help" - I repeat - the Desktop
is NOT DESIGNED to store data. If it was, why would there be the need
for "Documents" folder or "Music" folder etc, why not just store it all
on the Desktop?
I keep a copy of my Windows 7 laptop C: NTFS partition, as
a VHD mounted in a Ubuntu virtual machine on this computer.

That allows me to view the file system, without prejudice by
anything running in that Windows system.

When I click that C: partition in Ubuntu, then navigate
to the user folder, I see this. /media/Acer is the mount
point within Ubuntu. Everything from "users" on down, is
under C:.

/media/Acer/users/username/Desktop
amcap - Shortcut.lnk <--- for using a webcam
desktop.ini

Inside desktop.ini it says:

[.ShellClassInfo]
LocalizedResourceName=@%SystemRoot%\system32\shell32.dll,-21769
IconResource=%SystemRoot%\system32\imageres.dll,-183

and that is there presumably, to describe how to present the info.

The various presentation types, their desktop.ini, are listed here.

http://www.winhelponline.com/articl...he-standard-folder-icon-in-Windows-Vista.html

So it's just a folder, with a desktop.ini containing info on what
to do in addition, with the contained files.

Paul
 
N

Nil

Many many people have had instances of corrupted desktops and any
data stored there is GONE. Google it.
Please point out a credible example of data being lost due to being
stored on the Desktop. I searched and I can find no such thing.
I don't care WHAT it says in Windows 7 "help" - I repeat - the
Desktop is NOT DESIGNED to store data.
I don't care what it says, either, although I give it more credence
than I do you. I've used and supported Windows for decades, and I
have never seen an example of data files being lost specifically
because they were stored on Windows Desktop.
If it was, why would there be the need for "Documents" folder or
"Music" folder etc, why not just store it all on the Desktop?
Organization and neatness. You can store anything anywhere. You can
store music files in the Documents folder and vice versa. You can
store any kind of file you want on the Desktop. They are all just
file system directories and they are all equally accessible and
equally safe from corruption.

Sorry, you are laboring under one or several misconceptions.
 
J

J. P. Gilliver (John)

OREALLY said:
Yes...The folder was showing up for a couple of days and then it
vanished. I had to copy the folder from Windows Explorer to another
folder and then back to the desktop. As mentioned... Not the first time
this has happened!

"Ed Cryer" wrote in message
[]
So the folder is still there really, but the icon for it on the desktop
is disappearing - is that right?

Just a thought: have you left on (as it is by default) the thing that
from time to time "tidies" the desktop by moving things it _thinks_ you
are not using into a special place (called something like "unused items"
- I forget precisely as I usually turn it off). [There's a similar one
for the quickstart bar and the tray, I think.] Such a thing probably
doesn't move the real file, but may make its icon disappear from the
visual presentation of the desktop.
 
J

J. P. Gilliver (John)

Alias said:
On 07/21/2011 07:58 PM, Char Jackson wrote: []
Don't use the desktop to store data of any kind. It's not designed
to do that. The Desktop folder is a special type of System folder.
Store your data in your User account folders.
You can of course set a SHORTCUT to various folders on your
desktop - the Desktop folder is designed to store shortcuts.

<cough> <sputter> What?!? It is a directory (folder for you young
'uns) on a hard disk, of course it is "designed to store data"
[]
I performed your test using 95 gigs of 4-12GB movie files, then a
second time with 99 gigs of regular mp3 files. For a third test, I
used 92 gigs of jpg photos. (No time to do any more testing right
now.) I saw absolutely no difference in any of those cases compared to
my normally almost-empty desktop.
[]
Hmmm, I was misled, then. To be honest, I never tried it. Oh well, you
live and learn.
I think I may be able to shed some light on this: it may be to do with
roaming profiles. When I log in to a computer at work - _any_ computer
on the company's network - it fetches my "profile" from a "profile
server"; this includes (as well as lots of other things), my desktop.
Obviously, this takes significantly longer if there are a lot of actual
files, rather than just shortcuts, on the desktop. (Plus, we're limited
to a ridiculous 20M - yes, M! - for the total profile, but that's a
different matter.) [XP system, but I suspect that is irrelevant.)

For a single home user, or possibly even a multi-user computer that
isn't part of a network that has roaming profiles, it may not actually
matter - though I share "Alias"'s feeling that it's not a good idea,
except temporarily (which I think is what Microsoft mean when they
suggest it).
 
J

Jeff Layman

Gordon said:
Many many people have had instances of corrupted desktops and any data
stored there is GONE.
Google it.
I don't care WHAT it says in Windows 7 "help" - I repeat - the Desktop
is NOT DESIGNED to store data. If it was, why would there be the need
for "Documents" folder or "Music" folder etc, why not just store it all
on the Desktop?
I keep a copy of my Windows 7 laptop C: NTFS partition, as
a VHD mounted in a Ubuntu virtual machine on this computer.

That allows me to view the file system, without prejudice by
anything running in that Windows system.

When I click that C: partition in Ubuntu, then navigate
to the user folder, I see this. /media/Acer is the mount
point within Ubuntu. Everything from "users" on down, is
under C:.

/media/Acer/users/username/Desktop
amcap - Shortcut.lnk<--- for using a webcam
desktop.ini

Inside desktop.ini it says:

[.ShellClassInfo]
LocalizedResourceName=@%SystemRoot%\system32\shell32.dll,-21769
IconResource=%SystemRoot%\system32\imageres.dll,-183

and that is there presumably, to describe how to present the info.

The various presentation types, their desktop.ini, are listed here.

http://www.winhelponline.com/articl...he-standard-folder-icon-in-Windows-Vista.html

So it's just a folder, with a desktop.ini containing info on what
to do in addition, with the contained files.
The way what is on the disk is displayed depends a lot on what file
manager is used to view it. Not liking the W7 Windows Explorer, I tried
several file managers, and they all listed the folders in different
ways. The nearest I get to the Ubuntu way is to use FreeCommander,
This shows Local Disk C: at the top, with all the other folders off it
in alphabetical order. One particular advantage (to me) is that it does
not show the Libraries or Homegroup folders at all. I have to dig way
down in the C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Windows folder
to see Libraries. One disadvantage is that it takes a time to dig down
to Desktop, so I keep that folder as the default folder display in the
second column.
 
K

Ken Blake

Please point out a credible example of data being lost due to being
stored on the Desktop. I searched and I can find no such thing.


I don't care what it says, either, although I give it more credence
than I do you. I've used and supported Windows for decades, and I
have never seen an example of data files being lost specifically
because they were stored on Windows Desktop.

Many people assume that everything on the desktop is a shortcut, and
that if you delete it, you can easily get it back by recreating the
shortcut. I've seen several examples of files being lost this way.
 
C

Char Jackson

Many many people have had instances of corrupted desktops and any data
stored there is GONE.
Google it.
While you're Googling, go ahead and substitute 'desktop' for any other
common file location. The results will be similar. There's no end to
the number of computer illiterates who believe their files have
"disappeared" for one reason or another. In 99.99% of the cases, of
course, it's simple user error and has absolutely nothing to do with
where the files were stored.
I don't care WHAT it says in Windows 7 "help" - I repeat - the Desktop
is NOT DESIGNED to store data.
Obviously, that's not true, but if you'd rather store your data in
other places you're certainly free to do so. I can't even begin to
guess where your misunderstanding stems from.
If it was, why would there be the need
for "Documents" folder or "Music" folder etc, why not just store it all
on the Desktop?
Some people need to be nudged to get them to organize their data.
Don't read too much into it. Go ahead and store your documents, your
music, your pictures, and whatever else you have anywhere you'd like
to store it, including the Desktop if that suits your work flow.
 
G

Gene E. Bloch

What, no ash tray? [This is meant as a joke!]
On my personal desk at home, 10 years ago there would have been...
Though I can't think of an electronic equivalent right off :)
I quit in 1968 :)

For the electronic version, will the Recycle Bin do?

Never mind, I shouldn't have thought of that idea...
 
N

Nil

Many people assume that everything on the desktop is a shortcut, and
that if you delete it, you can easily get it back by recreating the
shortcut. I've seen several examples of files being lost this way.
Well, yeah, of course. But that's different. This guy is claiming that
files on Windows Desktop are in danger of disappearing or becoming
corrupt just because they are on the Desktop. In your example, they
disappeared because the user did something dumb. They didn't just
disappear on their own.
 
K

Ken Blake

Well, yeah, of course. But that's different. This guy is claiming that
files on Windows Desktop are in danger of disappearing or becoming
corrupt just because they are on the Desktop. In your example, they
disappeared because the user did something dumb. They didn't just
disappear on their own.

Right. I wasn't trying to say anything any different.

But I do think that putting files on the desktop is a poor idea
because it exposes you to the risk of doing something dumb.
 
G

Gene E. Bloch

Right. I wasn't trying to say anything any different.

But I do think that putting files on the desktop is a poor idea
because it exposes you to the risk of doing something dumb.
Well, now. Using a computer exposes people to that risk *whatever* they
do :)
 
K

Ken Blake

Well, now. Using a computer exposes people to that risk *whatever* they
do :)


Exposes people to *some* such risk? Certainly. But depending on what
you do, you can increase the risk or minimize it. I recommend
minimizing it.

It isn't very different from walking across the street. There too, you
can increase the risk or minimize it.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top