Windows Live Mail 2011

  • Thread starter W. K. Mahler, Mahlers.Com
  • Start date
W

W. K. Mahler, Mahlers.Com

Hi


With Windows Mail, I could go up to edit, then select all and all email from
the inbox would be highlighted and sent to the deleted items folder. Not so
with Windows Live Mail 2011 or am I missing something after an extensive
interface search?

Thanks


W. K. Mahler
http://www.mahlers.com
 
S

Stan Brown

Hi


With Windows Mail, I could go up to edit, then select all and all email from
the inbox would be highlighted and sent to the deleted items folder. Not so
with Windows Live Mail 2011 or am I missing something after an extensive
interface search?
Please, please, pretty please don't use it for posting to newsgroups.
Its quoting style is severely broken, and it messes up every thread
it touches.
 
R

relic

W. K. Mahler said:
Hi


With Windows Mail, I could go up to edit, then select all and all email
from the inbox would be highlighted and sent to the deleted items folder.
Not so with Windows Live Mail 2011 or am I missing something after an
extensive interface search?
Replace Windows Live 2011 with Windows Live 2009 before everybody screams at
you..
 
W

W. K. Mahler, Mahlers.Com

I've had Windows Live Mail 2011 up and pressed ALT to no avail, there is no
"highlight email, edit, select all and move" feature, any ideas other than
the forum listed in a reply?

Thanks,

William

"W. K. Mahler, Mahlers.Com" wrote in message

Hi


With Windows Mail, I could go up to edit, then select all and all email from
the inbox would be highlighted and sent to the deleted items folder. Not so
with Windows Live Mail 2011 or am I missing something after an extensive
interface search?

Thanks


W. K. Mahler
http://www.mahlers.com
 
K

KCB

W. K. Mahler said:
I've had Windows Live Mail 2011 up and pressed ALT to no avail, there is
no "highlight email, edit, select all and move" feature, any ideas other
than the forum listed in a reply?

Thanks,

William

"W. K. Mahler, Mahlers.Com" wrote in message

Hi


With Windows Mail, I could go up to edit, then select all and all email
from
the inbox would be highlighted and sent to the deleted items folder. Not
so
with Windows Live Mail 2011 or am I missing something after an extensive
interface search?

Thanks


W. K. Mahler
http://www.mahlers.com
The "highlight email, edit, select all and move" feature that you mention is
actually a list of separate steps. Here are two ways of doing what you are
asking.

1)Click on one of your emails in your Inbox. Press the Alt key (don't hold
it down). The File Menu should appear at the top. Click Edit, then when
the menu drops down select "Select All", then press your delete key. If you
want to move them all, just drag them to the folder of your choice after you
have them all selected.

Option 2) Click one of your emails. Press Ctrl (hold it) then press the A
key. Release both keys. At this point, all the emails in that folder
should be selected. Press the delete key.

The Ctrl+A is generic, and will work to "Select All" in almost any file or
group listing, as long as your focus is on/in the group to begin with. You
can't have the focus 'on' the Inbox Folder, it must be 'on' one of the
messages in it. That is why you start each step by clicking one of the
messages, it makes sure the focus is in the right place.
 
S

Stan Brown

I've had Windows Live Mail 2011 up
Please get rid of it. Yes, I am serious. Its quoting style is
severely broken, and many posters will simply put you in their kill
files because reading the output of WLM 15 (Windows Like Mail 2011)
is so annoying.
 
T

Tester

Stan said:
WLM 15 (Windows Like Mail 2011)
There is no such thing as: Windows Like Mail 2011. Did you mean:
Windows Live Mail 2011? If not please clarify. Thunderbird (which I
use - version 2) comes little short of Windows Like Mail but Microsoft
is Microsoft and Mozilla is Mozilla. The two are too proud to be
compared with each other.
 
S

Stan Brown

There is no such thing as: Windows Like Mail 2011. Did you mean:
Windows Live Mail 2011?
One point for you. Thanks for the correction.

If someone could invent a spell checker that would flag a word that
is correctly spelled but not the word I meant to use, s/he would have
the thanks of a grateful world.
 
A

Alex Clayton

One point for you. Thanks for the correction.

If someone could invent a spell checker that would flag a word that
is correctly spelled but not the word I meant to use, s/he would have
the thanks of a grateful world.

I would buy a copy of that for sure!!
<G>
 
X

XS11E

Stan Brown said:
If someone could invent a spell checker that would flag a word
that is correctly spelled but not the word I meant to use, s/he
would have the thanks of a grateful world.
Time for this again?

Eye halve a spelling chequer
It came with my pea sea,
It plainly marques four my revue
Miss steaks eye kin knot sea.

Eye strike a key and type a word
And weight for it two say,
Weather eye and wring oar write
It shows me strait a weigh.

As soon as a mist ache is maid
It nose bee fore two long,
And eye can put the error rite
Its rare lea ever wrong.

To rite with care is quite a feet
Of witch won should bee proud,
And wee mussed dew the best wee can,
Sew flaw's are knot aloud.

Eye have run this poem threw it
Your sure reel glad two no,
Its letter perfect awl the weigh
My chequer tolled me sew.

-Sauce unknown
 
B

BillW50

In
XS11E said:
Time for this again?

Eye halve a spelling chequer
It came with my pea sea,
It plainly marques four my revue
Miss steaks eye kin knot sea.

Eye strike a key and type a word
And weight for it two say,
Weather eye and wring oar write
It shows me strait a weigh.

As soon as a mist ache is maid
It nose bee fore two long,
And eye can put the error rite
Its rare lea ever wrong.

To rite with care is quite a feet
Of witch won should bee proud,
And wee mussed dew the best wee can,
Sew flaw's are knot aloud.

Eye have run this poem threw it
Your sure reel glad two no,
Its letter perfect awl the weigh
My chequer tolled me sew.

-Sauce unknown
Well I thought the answer was obvious! A grammar checker. So I fired up
Word 2000 and ran the above through and it found nothing wrong with it
at all. :-(
 
B

Bob Henson

Stan said:
One point for you. Thanks for the correction.

If someone could invent a spell checker that would flag a word that
is correctly spelled but not the word I meant to use, s/he would have
the thanks of a grateful world.
Outlook (hence Word) 2007 does limited context checking, but I doubt it
will correct our worst clangers :)
 
B

Bob I

One point for you. Thanks for the correction.

If someone could invent a spell checker that would flag a word that
is correctly spelled but not the word I meant to use, s/he would have
the thanks of a grateful world.
Actually they exist, and are called "grammar checkers". This is due to
the fact while the word is not incorrectly spelled, it is incorrect
grammar!(imagine that!)
 
B

Bob I

In

Well I thought the answer was obvious! A grammar checker. So I fired up
Word 2000 and ran the above through and it found nothing wrong with it
at all. :-(
Word 2007 marked about 20 words with grammar and style enabled.
 
B

BillW50

In
Bob said:
Word 2007 marked about 20 words with grammar and style enabled.
In Word 2000 defense, I do have it set really relaxed. Got tired of it
being so nitpicky. ;-)
 
S

Stan Brown

Actually they exist, and are called "grammar checkers". This is due to
the fact while the word is not incorrectly spelled, it is incorrect
grammar!(imagine that!)
But "Windows Live Mail" and "Windows Like Mail" are both
ungrammatical. Microsoft Word passes the first and rejects the
second, but I suspect that's because Word's checker comes preloaded
with the names of Microsoft products.

Does anyone know of a neutral (third-party) grammar checker that
allows "Windows Live Mail" but rejects "Windows Like Mail"?
 
S

SC Tom

BillW50 said:
In

In Word 2000 defense, I do have it set really relaxed. Got tired of it
being so nitpicky. ;-)
Word 2003 picked 2 spelling (chequer and marques), and 7 grammar, mostly
caps and misplaced commas. OE found the same two spelling errors. Butt watt
dew they no? ;-)
 
G

Gene E. Bloch

Word 2003 picked 2 spelling (chequer and marques), and 7 grammar, mostly
caps and misplaced commas. OE found the same two spelling errors. Butt watt
dew they no? ;-)
Knot mutch.

Footnote:
Mutch is not recognized by Dialog's spellchecker, the Merriam-Webster
Collegiate Dictionary on my Android phone, nor my American Heritage
paper dictionary. It *is* in my Random House Webster's Unabridged paper
dictionary, and it's available in my desktop gadget dictionaries, both
of which seem to use Dictionary.com.

It's some kind of hat or cap from olden times.

All of this for a fairly weak joke!
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top