An interesting wrinkle is that they (especially webpage designers)
should be forced to use them via access software, with their monitor
taken away altogether ... I have normal sight (except I don't have the
brain pathways to make use of it being stereoscopic), but I have an
interest in access for the blind. (_Most_ things that make access for
the VH/VI easier are matters of good interface design practice anyway;
certainly the converse is true, that most things that make VH/VI access
more difficult are poor general interface design.)
I think this is the problem with many of Firefox's "improvements." Some
dev wants a feature, at the planning conference (s)he persuades the
others it's cool, and it's done (or undone if an existing feature is
judged uncool). The complaints from ordinary users are ignored, or
explained away, or (worse) "fixed" by offering workarounds. I suspect
that the proposed W8 GUI is the result of some dev's desire for a
"clean" interface.
Where the removal (or hiding) of features is concerned, it's certainly
tempting to believe that it's more sinister than just "un-coolness", i.
e. done at the behest of (or, at the very least, with the thought that
it might please) the major paymasters. Such as third-party image and
cookie blocking.
Not that it matters much. MS has been playing catch-up instead of
innovation ever since NT3.5.
Sigh.
Wolf K.
Hmm.