J
J. P. Gilliver (John)
(So I guess I'd use that. But fair enough, this is a 7 newsgroup.)
[]
utility, fair enough. OP just wanted to resize.
[]
or one of many - is that people don't make clear what they mean by
"resize": do they mean reducing the number of pixels, the size of the
file, both, or something else again? (Actually, I think the OP said he
wanted the images to appear smaller on his screen: assuming he is
therefore not using a zooming utility or whatever to view them, i. e.
viewing them at one pixel to the pixel, then he _does_ mean reducing the
size in pixels.)
[]
[]
OK; if your needs (or desires) are such that you need a commercialI have Photoshop been through the rest. Photoshop does more than Ill
utility, fair enough. OP just wanted to resize.
I'll take your word for that.ever want. Images resized or saved in others are sometimes never as
good. they just don't "compile" the image as "smoothly".
[]
[You might lose them though, rather than loose them (-:.] The problem -There are quite a few people who don't understand resizing images. One
such is the originator of this thread.
A pixel is a pixel on the screen and resolution does not come into it.
Sure the quality comes in when compressing an image then expanding it
will degregate the image but you still don't loose pixels.
or one of many - is that people don't make clear what they mean by
"resize": do they mean reducing the number of pixels, the size of the
file, both, or something else again? (Actually, I think the OP said he
wanted the images to appear smaller on his screen: assuming he is
therefore not using a zooming utility or whatever to view them, i. e.
viewing them at one pixel to the pixel, then he _does_ mean reducing the
size in pixels.)
[]