Hardware upgrades and win7

[John Aldred]

*groan* Please don't dredge up the thread that went on for ages in
this newsgroup where a certain person incorrectly claimed that "the
computer" (for licensing purposes) referred to the motherboard, and
then went on to claim that his motherboard has a CPU and enough
storage onboard to run Windows. It was a mess of a thread.

No, you will be please to see it's not that one.

 

[Char Jackson]

I was referring to Windows Live Mail, sorry I should have made myself a
little more clear on that.

Gotcha, thanks.

 

[Bob H]

I can't install one part/component one at a time because the new board
is a 1156 socket and the old one is a 775 socket. So the cpu and board
must go together first. Then the ram I have ort will be getting soon is
DDR3, whereas the ram on my existing board is DDR2.

 

[xfile]

I can't install one part/component one at a time because the new board is

a 1156 socket and the old one is a 775 socket. So the cpu and board must
go together first. Then the ram I have ort will be getting soon is DDR3,
whereas the ram on my existing board is DDR2.

I guess so, it was just a thought as mentioned. Good luck!

 

[xfile]

<Nothing valuable to be quoted>

You are incapable of learning and have been proven beyond any reasonable
doubt to be a troll, so the reply was not for you.

There will be no 120-day limitation if no reactivation was incurred. As
mentioned, sometimes (meaning under certain conditions) a reactivation could
be avoided, and since there was no reactivation, neither will a 120-day
requirement incur.

This is a very simple and basic dependency relationship, and again, please
use your brain - Alias. <-------- This is for you.

 

[xfile]

You are much older than me and this is the best you can do?

You really made my day, my dear Alias.