In message <
[email protected]>,
Char Jackson said:
True! (Or should I say guilty?
) I've only skimmed it
because it's been about people trying to justify the
continued usage of floppy disks, for cryin' out loud! ;-)
Since you've clearly decided to close your mind on the
subject, you might as well stop reading the thread. [Maybe
someone'll start to wonder why they should continue using
Char Jackson ... (-:]
To put it simply: we have equipment that we occasionally
need to extract a small file from. The equipment has a
floppy drive. Networking the equipment isn't on the cards
(let us say for security reasons - that's certainly been
mentioned as one of the reasons). We have a USB floppy
drive on our network machine. The equipment is designed for
the specific task it does (support the testing and
trouble-shooting of a particular product).
Sure, we could upgrade the equipment to an operating system
that could support USB, including rewriting at least some
of the specially-written software. But how would this
benefit us? (To do so - and get the upgraded hardware and
software, and the procedures for using it that would have
to be rewritten, all approved, quite possibly by the
customer as well as our own people - would cost a
significant amount. In fact it's that which would dominate
the cost, rather than that of just the equipment.) I should
say that the supported product, though quite modern
technology, is no longer in manufacture, but we have a
contract to support (and to some extent upgrade) it.