Wolf said:
If this is the problem, I think you have it backwards.
Wolf K.
This a superb conversation. It makes me proud to be a linguist.
If science has an objective language that can be shared throughout the
scientific community, by which observations can be recorded and shared,
and by which truth can gradually be narrowed as theory replaces theory,
well, I have yet to discover it.
In a world where we can't even prove that reality exists beyond mental
awareness; wherein a Higgs boson is necessary for the Standard Model of
particle physics and yet, if isolated and found, will simply corroborate
the theory rather than set it as true; wherein quantum theory has never
been falsified through millions of tests and yet involves the
Uncertainty Principle that confounds human reason; well, if even users
of the same language can't make head or tail of each other's statements,
then that would seem rather appropriate to the known status quo.
Ed