OFF-Topic......
Microsoft has admitted Windows users should install antivirus above and beyond its own Security Essentials, describing its protection as merely a "baseline" that will "always be on the bottom" of antivirus software rankings.
Microsoft launched Security Essentials in 2009, raising complaints from antivirus rivals that such software shouldn't be bundled with Windows for competition reasons.
However, the most frequent complaint about Security Essentials is that it's not good enough: it
flunked a pair of tests earlier this year - including one from
Dennis Technology Labs, a testing firm affiliated with
PC Pro's publisher.
Now, Microsoft has said it sees Security Essentials as merely the first layer of protection, advising customers to use additional, third-party antivirus - although the company stressed that wasn't because the product wasn't good enough to stand on its own.
Read more:
Microsoft: Security Essentials is designed to be bottom of the antivirus rankings | Security | News | PC Pro http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/security/384394/microsoft-security-essentials-is-designed-to-be-bottom-of-the-antivirus-rankings#ixzz3C9qyLYVH
Another article :
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Micr...-Just-a-Basic-Anti-Virus-Product-386213.shtml
..............................................................................................................
quote.....
Now, Microsoft has said it sees Security Essentials as merely the first layer of protection, advising customers to use additional, third-party antivirus - although the company stressed that wasn't because the product wasn't good enough to stand on its own..........
Sounds very much like the talk of "sitting on the fence " politician.
My personal conclusion :
For established, experienced computer users, MSE is good enough.
For ordinary, average users who may not always follow proper security practices, a stronger AV is advisable. Naturally, no security program will be good enough to protect any one who is careless or reckless.