R
Roland Whitson
As if it's not already known, OpenOffice, like most free open source
software, is a pile of crap.
http://www.infoworld.com/d/applications/office-compatibility-torture-test-302?page=0,0
Follow the pages and look at the carnage.
"In InfoWorld's tests using complex Word and Excel documents,
OpenOffice.org 3.1 failed to deliver on its promise of better
Microsoft Office interoperability, severely mangling our Microsoft
Word and Microsoft Excel test data files. By stark contrast, SoftMaker
Office showed excellent compatibility with Office 2003 file formats,
making it a safe choice for heterogeneous environments -- at least
where external data access wasn¢t a priority. Neither OpenOffice.org
nor SoftMaker Office was able to preserve links to an external SQL
data source in imported Microsoft Excel documents."
"The three images below show the identical document section rendered
under Microsoft Word 2010 (in compatibility mode), OpenOffice Writer
3.1, and TextMaker 2009, respectively. Notice how OpenOffice mangled
the hanging indent in the bulleted list, while Word and TextMaker
rendered the list correctly. (Click each image for a closer look.)"
And this one from the last page is the best!
http://www.infoworld.com/d/applications/office-compatibility-torture-test-302?page=0,4
"Finally, these last three images show what happens when you import
the same file in Office 2007 (Open XML, .docx) format. OpenOffice
Writer completely lost track of the embedded charts and drawings,
reducing them to gibberish at the top of the document (first and
second images). By contrast, the beta release of TextMaker 2009 (third
image) successfully imported and rendered the entire contents of the
Office 2007-formatted Word document"
But of course Peter KKKolhmann claims Openoffice translates documents
just fine and Chris Ahlstrom claims he sends OO documents all the time
to co-workers and they don't seem to have any problems.
I prefer to believe Infoworld over the lying Linux cracked pots.
software, is a pile of crap.
http://www.infoworld.com/d/applications/office-compatibility-torture-test-302?page=0,0
Follow the pages and look at the carnage.
"In InfoWorld's tests using complex Word and Excel documents,
OpenOffice.org 3.1 failed to deliver on its promise of better
Microsoft Office interoperability, severely mangling our Microsoft
Word and Microsoft Excel test data files. By stark contrast, SoftMaker
Office showed excellent compatibility with Office 2003 file formats,
making it a safe choice for heterogeneous environments -- at least
where external data access wasn¢t a priority. Neither OpenOffice.org
nor SoftMaker Office was able to preserve links to an external SQL
data source in imported Microsoft Excel documents."
"The three images below show the identical document section rendered
under Microsoft Word 2010 (in compatibility mode), OpenOffice Writer
3.1, and TextMaker 2009, respectively. Notice how OpenOffice mangled
the hanging indent in the bulleted list, while Word and TextMaker
rendered the list correctly. (Click each image for a closer look.)"
And this one from the last page is the best!
http://www.infoworld.com/d/applications/office-compatibility-torture-test-302?page=0,4
"Finally, these last three images show what happens when you import
the same file in Office 2007 (Open XML, .docx) format. OpenOffice
Writer completely lost track of the embedded charts and drawings,
reducing them to gibberish at the top of the document (first and
second images). By contrast, the beta release of TextMaker 2009 (third
image) successfully imported and rendered the entire contents of the
Office 2007-formatted Word document"
But of course Peter KKKolhmann claims Openoffice translates documents
just fine and Chris Ahlstrom claims he sends OO documents all the time
to co-workers and they don't seem to have any problems.
I prefer to believe Infoworld over the lying Linux cracked pots.