Not true. It has everything a home user would need: email, browsers,
Skype, IM, audio and video capabilities, etc.
Linux becoming popular doesn't therefore translate into it becoming
Mac or Windows like.
It's already Mac/windows like in that it uses the same GUI metaphor,
or 'WIMP' interface, and has for ages now.
As its popularity increases, various distros will
emerge as the most popular and then the software houses will start
paying attention and port to Linux.
Don't get me wrong. I like Linux and use it (Ubuntu) on one of my
laptops from time to time. I'm just saying it will never gain
critical mass marketshare on general userspace desktops, nor do I
really prefer to see it happen either. This would simply lead to
generally dumbed down UI's for dumbed down users, and bloatware.
I fail to see why Linux folks see this as some sort of threat. Linux
has sufficient critical mass to see continued use and support. Who
gives a rat's ass if Joe Sixpack is too slow to adopt it, or use it?
For those who need general productivity environments, Linux is
puhlenty mature enough as it sits, and sees frequent updates, fixes,
enhancements on a regular basis. What more can one ask for? Why
should Joe Sixpack be 'catered' to with dumbed down UIs and bloatware?
Why go after these folks? Let's not repeat the MS/Apple mistakes.
Let Linux development march to its own drumbeat.